Tuesday, September 02, 2014

The INSIDER - August 28, 2014

Posted on InsideDefense.com: August 28, 2014

DOD won't comment on it yet, but it's issued a new policy on electromagnetic environmental effects that has at least one lawmaker very interested:

Lawmaker Praises DOD's New Anti-EMP Policy For Weapon Systems

Arizona Republican Rep. Trent Franks this week praised a new Defense Department instruction as major step toward recognizing electromagnetic effects as significant threats.

The instruction, issued Aug. 25, establishes a new electromagnetic environmental effects (E3) program and requires that all military platforms, systems, subsystems and equipment be operational in the case of a man-made or natural electromagnetic incident.

"The recently announced DOD electromagnetic environmental effects (E3) program is a very insightful and vigilant step forward on their part in preparing for future warfare challenges," Franks said in an Aug. 27 statement to Inside the Pentagon. "As the department prepares for future anti-access area-denial environments, addressing electromagnetic pulse vulnerabilities will be critical to our ability to defend the nation against all threats."

Signed by acting DOD Chief Information Officer Terry Halvorsen, the policy mandates that all new defense items be outfitted during the acquisition process with hardware to mitigate the effects of electromagnetic interference (EMI). Additionally, existing items may be retrofitted with EMI-repelling features during their acquisition life cycle, according to a congressional aide. The instruction also requires the use of tactics, techniques and procedures to keep military systems operational in the case of an EMI incident.

DOCUMENT: DOD Instruction On Electromagnetic Environmental Effects

As noted in the story, no comment from the Pentagon. More to come.

Over There.

The top House authorizer on Iraq:

Rep. McKeon Calls For Comprehensive Strategy, Funding To Stop ISIS

The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee called on the White House this week to develop a comprehensive strategy to combat the Islamic State of Iraq in Syria in ways that go beyond the fiscal year 2015 budget.

Rep. Buck McKeon (R-CA) challenged President Obama to "engage Congress" in this process, arguing that the administration's "minimalist approach" is inadequate to confront the threat posed by ISIS.

"There is no negotiating with ISIS or deterring it; it must be defeated and destroyed," McKeon said in an Aug. 27 statement. "ISIS is an urgent threat and a minimalist approach, that depends solely on FY-15 funding or pinprick strikes that leave fragile forces in Iraq and Syria to do the hard fighting, is insufficient to protect our interests and guarantee our safety."


What's next for the Advanced Hypersonic Weapon?

Hypersonic Weapon Test Failure Expected To Cause Program Setbacks

The recent termination of the Advanced Hypersonic Weapon test flight shortly after liftoff will be a setback to the faster-than-the-speed-of-sound program designed to strike faraway and fleeting targets, according to experts and officials tracking the program.

The Army Space and Missile Defense Command was unable to evaluate the AHW during its Aug. 25 test because a booster rocket experienced an anomaly after liftoff, and caused authorities to terminate the flight for safety reasons. James Acton, a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment, told InsideDefense.com Monday that the test termination "appears to say more about the booster than anything about the glider."

Although the test failure can't be blamed on the AHW itself, the whole program faces a setback, said aerospace consultant Leon McKinney, who tracks hypersonics programs. Because the test was terminated shortly after launch, no test data was able to be recovered.

"While the saying 'you learn something with every flight, even failed flights' is always true, this sort of failure doesn't provide much positive learning related to AHW," McKinney said, suggesting that the only lesson learned relates to more carefully checking the launch vehicle used.

Rare Earth.

Inside the Pentagon had to use the Freedom of Information Act to get an inspector general report on rare earth elements released:

IG: DOD Lacks Reliable Process To Assess Rare Earth Element Supply

The Defense Department lacks a comprehensive and reliable process to assess rare earth element supply and demand, which could lead to shortfalls that impact readiness, the Pentagon inspector general says in a new report.

The report, dated July 3 and obtained by Inside the Pentagon through the Freedom of Information Act on Aug. 20, states that the Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials Division (DLA-SM) fell short in its survey of rare earth elements (REE), which may compromise the defense industrial base's supply.

According to the report, modeling done by the Institute for Defense Analysis for DLA-SM did not adequately assess market and environmental risks that could adversely affect REE data production forecasts used to estimate supplies.

"DLA-SM personnel should have ensured that IDA not only identified, but also analyzed, mitigated and tracked the risks that could adversely affect production capacity forecasts" for rare earth oxides, or unrefined REEs, the report states.

DOCUMENT: DOD Inspector General Report On Rare Earth Elements


The office of the Pentagon's top testers has updated a key document:

DOT&E Presentation On 'Reasons Behind Program Delays'

The Aug. 25, 2014, briefing from the office of the director of operational test and evaluation -- labeled an update to a prior briefing -- delves into reasons for defense acquisition program delays.

C3 Sitdown.

More from Inside the Pentagon:

Winnefeld, Kendall Voice Concern Over House Funding Of C3 System

Senior defense leaders are calling for a sitdown with lawmakers to discuss concerns that Congress has not provided enough funding for the National Leadership Command, Control and Communications System.

In a July 2 letter, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. James Winnefeld and Pentagon acquisition chief Frank Kendall wrote that they seek the opportunity to discuss the matter with congressional defense committees following a review of the House appropriators' fiscal year 2015 defense spending bill. Winnefeld and Kendall co-chair the Council on the Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control and Communications System.

-- This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

The daily INSIDER

The InsideDefense.com INSIDER is now a daily service, providing you with our latest news and analysis on the fast-paced changes happening at the Pentagon each day – breaking budget news, exclusive updates on major defense programs, hard-to-find documents and much more.

The INSIDER is a great way to stay ahead of the competition on the latest defense news.

If you haven't already, you'll have to create an account on our pay-per-view NewsStand service to continue receiving the INSIDER every day.

Setting up an account is free, and it will allow you the convenience of one-click access to the articles and documents referenced in the INSIDER. To get more details on the issues that matter most to you most, you'll pay only for what you want to read.

Most articles and documents cost just $10. And your first download is free when you set up an account.

If you have any questions about the INSIDER or InsideDefense.com's NewsStand, please contact our Customer Service Department at 1-800-424-9068 or newsstand@iwpnews.com.

Sign up for INSIDER alerts.

Targeted E-Letters

Now there's another way to access subject-specific content from InsideDefense.com and DefenseNewsStand.com. Our new E-Letters, delivered weekly by e-mail directly to your inbox, offer complete content packages covering ground vehicles, fixed-wing aircraft, or unmanned systems, all at highly affordable subscription rates.

More Information